|
Tuesday November 3rd
8:30 – 18:00 Registration
Main Auditorium
9:00 –10:30 PLENARY III /Patients and guidelines
Involving patients and eliciting their views: the HTAi experience - Karen Facey /Scotland
A Consumer View on Involvement in Clinical Effectiveness Activities - Carol Sakala / USA
Involving public in guideline: where next - Antoine Boivin / Canada
10:30 – 11:15 Coffee break and poster presentation
11:15 – 13:00 Parallel sessions / Workshops
PARALLEL SESSIONS
Room Expanção Messionária
Guideline ‘quilt’
L4 A national multidisciplinary guideline programme for youth care: prioritization,
methodology and implementation
Haske van Veenendaal1, Flip Dronkers2, Jessica van Rossum2, Ilse Raats1
1Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Netherlands Youth Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands
O45 Cost effectiveness of a general practice chronic disease management plan for coronary heart disease in Australia
Derek Chew1, Rob Carter2,3, Bree Rankin2, Andrew Boyden4, Helen Egan5
1Flinders University / Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 2The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 4National Heart Foundation of Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 5Formerly of National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
O46 COMPUS and the CADC: National and provincial collaboration in optimal prescribing recommendations
Mike Allen1, Bill Leslie2, Elaine Chong3, Debbie Bunka4, Loren Regier5, Shawn Bugden6, Lena Salach7, Margaret Jin8
1Dalhousie Continuing Medical Education, Halifax, Canada, 2Canadian Optimal Medication Prescribing and Utilization Service, Ottawa, Canada, 3BC Provinical Academic Detailing Service, Vancouver, Canada, 4Academic Detailing Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada, 5Rx Files Academic Detailing, Sasakatoon, Canada, 6Prescription Information Services of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada, 7Center for Effective Practice, Toronto, Canada, 8Academic Detailing Hamilton Family Health Team, Hamilton, Canada
O47 From knowlege to action. Clinical practice guidelines, electronic medical record and change management
Ana Clavería, Arturo Louro, Grupo Fisterra, Grupo IANUS, Teresa Cerdá
Servizo Galego de Saúde, Galicia, Spain
Room Descobrimentos Portugueses
National guideline programs I
O48 Are universal the factors related to physicians' adoption of Clinical Practice Guidelines?
- Experiences in Korea
Sun-Hee Lee1, Ju-Hye Kim1, Ju-Hyun Suh1, Hyung-Sik Ahn1,2
1School of Medicine Ewha Woman's University, SEOUL, Republic of Korea, , 2Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea,
O49 eCDS, Evidence and Transparency: Towards a standards-based approach for eCDS implementations
John Fraser
New Zealand Guidelines Group, Welllington, New Zealand
O50 Draft clinical guideline Internet consultation : first experiment in France.
Joëlle André-Vert, Valérie Lindecker, Patrice Dosquet
Haute Autorité de Santé, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France
O51 How to identify and bridge gaps between current practice and key recommendations in clinical guidelines for persons with concurrent mental disorders and substance use disorders?
Anne Landheim, Oystein Eiring, Amund Aakerholt, Hanne Stuen, Thomas Kulbrandstad
Centre for Addiction issues, 2312, Norway
O52 How HAS develops audit support: the stroke experience
Michel Laurence
Haute Autorité de Santé, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
O53 Interspecialty collaboration in the development of guidelines
Martin Reed
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Children's Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
O54 Just finished developing a guideline, how did we do? A process evaluation
Christa Harstall1, Paul Taenzer2, Ann Scott1, Donna Angus3, Carmen Moga1
1Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton,Alberta, Canada, 2Alberta Health Services Calgary and area, Calgary Alberta, Canada, 3Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Main Auditorium
Dealing with uncertainty
L5 Evidence-based management of people with chronic co-morbidity
Klara Brunnhuber, James Woodcock
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd., London, United Kingdom
O55 The last frontier? Autonomy, uncertainty and standardisation in Norwegian general practice
Benedicte Carlsen
1The Rokkan Centre, Bergen, Norway, 2The University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
O56 Translation of Evidence into Practice: An Experience from Internal Medicine and other Primary Care Practices
Amir Qaseem
American College of Physicians, Phildadelphia, PA, United States
O57 Linking Primary Care and Public Health: The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Applicability of clinical practice guidelines on patients with comorbid conditions
Kerry Robinson, Kimberly Elmslie, Catherine Makris
Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON., Canada
O58 Applicability of clinical practice guidelines on patients with comorbid conditions
Marjolein Lugtenberg1, Jako Burgers2,3, Gert Westert1,4, Carolyn Clancy5, Eric Schneider6,7
1Tilburg University (Tranzo), Tilburg, Netherlands, 2Radboud University Medcial Centre (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 4National Institute for Public Health and the Enviroment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands, 5Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, United States, 6RAND, Boston, United States, 7Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, United States
Room Exposições
Developing guidelines
O59 Piloting a new scoping process-the NICE guideline on hip fracture
Jennifer Hill, Saoussen Ftouh
National Clinical Guildelines Centre, London, United Kingdom
O60 Choosing topics for clinical practice guidelines: thinking of implementation since the beginning
Rochele Alberto Martins Santos1, Jorge Carvalho1, Karla Coelho1, Martha Oliveira1, Alfredo Scaff1, Fausto dos Santos1, Wanderley Bernardo2, Luciana Fonseca1
1Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Associação Médica Brasileira, São Paulo, Brazil
O61 Finding evidence and guidelines made easy: a thesaurus and software application for facilitating semi-automatic indexing of evidence summaries and guidelines
Peter Nyberg, Kimmo Rannanjärvi, Ilkka Kunnamo
Duodecim Medical Publications Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
O62 Rapid HTA reviews in cancer guideline development
Lene Kristine Juvet1, Espen Movik1, Borghild Svorken2, Inger Natvig Norderhaug1
1Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Po.Box 7004 St.Olavsplass, 0130 OSLO, Norway, 2Norwegian Directorate of Health, PO Box 7000 St. Olavs plass 0130 Oslo, Norway
O63 Incorporating a systematic review of qualitative studies into clinical practice guidelines on
kidney transplantation
Allison Tong1,2, Denise Campbell1, Jonathan Craig1,2
1CARI Guidelines, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
WORKSHOPS
Room Brasil
W7 AGREE II: Workshop B - Train the Trainer
Melissa Brouwers1, Julie Makarski1, George P. Browman2, Jako S. Burgers3, Francoise Cluzeau4, Dave Davis5, Gene Feder6, Beatrice Fervers7, Ian D. Graham8, Jeremy Grimshaw9, Steven E. Hanna1, Michelle E. Kho1, Peter Littlejohns10, Tom Oliver1, Louise Zitzelsberger11
1McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island, BC, Canada, 3Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 4St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom, 5Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, United States, 6University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 7Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France, 8University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 9Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 10National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London, United Kingdom, 11Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Room Timor
W8 Implementation of shared decision making. Integrating patient preferences in clinical practices guidelines. 'Thou shalt' or 'you choose': evidence medicine meets
preference-sensitive care
Trudy van der Weijden1, Marije Koelewijn1, Antoine Boivin1,2, France Légaré1,3, Jako Burgers1,4, Haske van Veenendaal1,4, Loes Knaapen1,5, Anne Stiggelbout1,6, Arwen Pieterse1,6, Glyn Elwyn1,7
1Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 2Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 3Laval University, Quebec, Canada, 4CBO Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands, 5McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 6Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands, 7Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Room Sociedade Ciêntifica
W9 Using the GRADE approach in osteoporosis guideline development; application and interpretation of indirectness
Piet Post1,2, Ton Kuijpers1,2, Holger Schunemann1,3, Stefan Lange1,4, Nicola Magrini1,5
1The GRADE Working Group, 2Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ont, Canada, 4Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, Germany, 5Centre for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Health Care, WHO Collaborating Centre on evidence-based research synthesis and guideline development, Modena, Italy
13:00 – 13:45 Lunch
13:45 – 14:15 Poster competition II
14:15 – 15:45 Parallel sessions / Workshops
PARALLEL SESSIONS
Room Expanção Messionária
Guidelines: theoretical and ethical perspectives
O64 Quality of ethical guidelines and ethical content in clinical guidelines
A systematic review of guidelines on medical end of life decisions
Daniel Strech1, Jan Schildmann2
1Hannover Medical School, Berlin, Germany, 2University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
O65 The need for ethics. Professional perspectives on work and health
Inge den Besten1, Medard Hilhorst1, Jim Faas3, Noks Nauta2, André Weel2
1Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Netherlands Society of Social Insurance Medicine (NVVG), Utrecht, Netherlands
O66 Value-based paragraphs in guidelines dealing with ethical perspectives on work and health
Noks Nauta1, André Weel1, Inge den Besten3, Jim Faas2, Medard Hilhorst3
1Netherlands Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB), Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Netherlands Society of SocialInsurance Medicine (NVVG), Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
O67 Promoting guideline based interventions in mental health-investigating a model that incorporates individual and organisational theories of change
Anne-Laure Couineau
1Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2National Institute of Clinical Studies, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
O68 Applying social learning theory and a knowledge translation framework results in guidelines implementation, change in clinical practice, behaviours and patient outcomes.
Mary Bell1, Lucie Brosseau2, Sydney Lineker3
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 3The Arthritis Society, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
O69 Guidelines as Knowledge Translation (KT): Activities at the Canadian Partnership against Cancer
Louise Zitzelsberger1, Margaret Harrison2, Melissa Brouwers3, George Browman4, Barbara Poole5, Walley Temple1
1Canadian Partnership against Cancer, Ottawa ON, Canada, 2Queens University, Kingston ON, Canada, 3McMaster University, Hamilton ON, Canada, 4British Columbia Cancer Agency, Victoria BC, Canada, 5British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver BC, Canada, 6Alberta Health Services, Calgary AB, Canada
Room Descobrimentos portugueses
National guideline program II
L 6 Twelve years of clinical practice guideline development, dissemination and evaluation in Canada (1994 to 2005)
Jennifer Kryworuchko1, Dawn Stacey1, Nan Bai2, Ian D Graham3,1
1University of Ottawa School of Nursing, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2Canadian Medical Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 3Knowledge Translation Portfolio, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
O70 Method for the development of national health care guidelines in Austria
Eva Baumer
Gesundheit Österreich GmbH/Bundesinstitut für Qualität im Gesundheitswesen, Vienna, Austria
O71 Involving children in guideline development - an innovative, multi-method pilot project
Jenny Gordon1, Roz Ullman2
1RCN, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2NCC-WCH, London, United Kingdom
O72 Poor agreement on assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines in France
Emmanuel Nouyrigat, Joëlle André-Vert, Catherine Solomon-Alexander, Brice Kitio, Patrice Dosquet
National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis, France
O73 Teaching Guideline Developers Up-to-Date Guideline Methodology: The Canadian Thoracic Society Experience
Samir Gupta1,5, Paul Hernandez2,5, Margaret Harrison4, Elena Goubanova5, Louis-Philippe Boulet3,5
1University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, 2Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, Canada, 3Laval University, Quebec, Canada, 4Queen's University, Kingston, Canada, 5Canadian Lung Association, Ottawa, Canada
Main Auditorium
Evidence and quality of guidelines
O74 Imprecision: Limitations of Using GRADE to Rate the Quality of Evidence on Adverse Effects - a case study
Toni PY Tan, Elizabeth J Shaw
National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (NICE), Manchester, United Kingdom
O75 Current Status and Quality of Clinical Practice Guideline for last 10 years in South Korea
Nam-Soon Kim1, Seungsoo Sheem2, Soo young Kim3, Min-Woo Jo4, Seon-Ha Kim4, Sang-Il Lee4
1Dongguk University, College of Medicine, GyeongJu, Korea, 2Ajou University, School of Medicine, Suweon, Korea, 3Hallym University, Medical College, Seoul, Korea, 4Uiversity of Ulsan, Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
O76 Applying GRADE to included studies in published Cochrane Reviews - experience from a national guideline on the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain
Toni PY Tan, Elizabeth J Shaw
National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence (NICE), Manchester, United Kingdom
O77 Combining evidence from randomised controlled trials and non-randomised controlled studies with modified GRADE in the nocturnal enuresis guideline
Katrina Sparrow, Vanessa Nunes, Norma O'Flynn
National Clinical Guidelines Centre for Acute and Chronic Conditions, Royal College of Physicians, London, United Kingdom
Room Exposições
Guidelines crossing borders II
O78 Guideline adaptation in practice: preliminary results from the evaluation of the use of the ADAPTE framework and process
Rachel Voellinger1, Béatrice Fervers2, Bernard Burnand1, ADAPTE Group1
1CHUV & University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Centre Léon Bérard, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
O79 Refinement of the ADAPTE manual and process to fit the needs of the CoCanCPG partners
Wiebke Hoffmann1, Michel Laurence2, Uwe Hasenbein1, Michael Kulig1, Alric Rüther1, Najoua Mlika-Cabanne2
1Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Healthcare, Cologne, North Westphalia, Germany, 2Haute Autorité de santé, St Denis La Plaine Cedex, France
O80 Application of the CoCanCPG (Coordination of Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines in Europe)-ADAPTE manual on prostate cancer CPG of the French National Cancer Institute (INCa).
Clotilde Séblain-El Guerche1, Valérie Mazeau-Woynar1, Uwe Hasenbein2, Wiebke Hoffmann2, Michael Külig2, Alric Rüther2, Michel Laurence3, Najoua Mlika-Cabanne3
1Institut National du Cancer (INCa), Boulogne Billancourt, France, 2Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWIG), Cologne, Germany, 3Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Saint denis, France
O81 Saving money, time and preserving quality of guideline. Italian SNLG experience in using ADAPTE
Cristina Morciano1, Daniela Spettoli2, Simona Di Mario2, Paola Laricchiuta1, Vittorio Basevi2
1Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy, 2Centro per la Valutazione dell'efficacia dell'assistenza sanitaria, Modena, Italy
O82 Benefits and limitations of the ADAPTE process for guideline adaptation: the experience of developing a venous
Sonja Hood1, Agnes Wilson1, Philippa F Middleton2, Rebecca Tooher2, Susan M Phillips1, Michael Frommer3
1National Institute of Clinical Studies/National Health and Medical Research Council, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2ARCH: Australian Research Centre for Health of Women and Babies, Women's and Children's Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia, 3The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
O83 Adapting the ADAPTE Framework
Christa Harstall1, Paul Taenzer2, Carmen Moga1, Donna Angus3, Ann Scott1
1Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 2Calgary Health Region Chronic Pain Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 3Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
WORKSHOPS
Room Brasil
W10 What tools in the toolbox? Supporting effective patient and public involvement in guidelines
Antoine Boivin1, France Légaré2, Trudy van der Weijden3, Chrstine Pakenham4, Sylvie Tapp2, Jako Burgers1
1Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2Canada Research Chair in Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Primary Care, Université Laval, Québec, Canada, 3School for Public Health and Primary Care (Caphri), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Ministère de la Santé et des Services Sociaux du Québec, Québec, Canada
Room Timor
W11 Integrating evidence and recommendations related to health allied professionals and nurses in multidisciplinary clinical guidelines
Philip van der Wees1,2, Antonio Lopes1,3, Sarah Bazin1,4, Maria Augusta de Sousa5, Jan Custers2, Else Poot6, Dunja Dreesens7, Jenny Gordon10
1European Region of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (ER-WCPT), Brussels, Belgium, 2Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie (KNGF; Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy), Amersfoort, Netherlands, 3Associacao Portuguesa de Fisiotherapistas (APF; Association of Portuguese Physiotherapists), S. Domingo de Rana, Portugal, 4Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP), London, United Kingdom, 5Bastonária da Ordem dos Enfermeiros (Portuguese Order of Nursing), Lisboa, Portugal, 6Landelijk Expertisecentrum Verpleging & Verzorging (LEVV; Netherlands Centre of Excellence in Nursing), Utrecht, Netherlands, 7ZonMw, Nederlandse organisatie voor gezondheidsonderzoek en zorginnovatie (Netherlands organisation for health research and develoment), Den Haag, Netherlands, 8Maastricht University, Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands, 9UMC St Radboud, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 10Royal College of Nursing, Oxford, United Kingdom
Room Sociedade Ciêntifica
W12 A quality-driven, pragmatic approach to crafting guideline action statements and evidence profiles
Richard Rosenfeld1,2, Richard Shiffman3
1SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States, 2American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria, VA, United States, 3Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
Main Auditorium
15:45 – 16:30 Coffee break and poster presentation
16:30 – 18:00 Annual General Meeting
19:30 – 00:00 Gala Dinner – Mercado da Ribeira
|
