|
Monday November 2nd, 2009
8:00 – 18:00 Registration and Poster Set Up
Main Auditorium
8:45 – 09:00 Opening ceremony
Opening words: Sara Twaddle (G-I-N Chair)
Prof.ª Maria do Céu Machado (High Commissioner of health)
António Vaz Carneiro (President of the Local Organizing Committee)
Main Auditorium
9:00 – 10:30 PLENARY I / Knowledge transfer between countries
Keynote: Knowledge transfer and cultural differences - Alessandro Liberati / Italy
Discussants: How does it work - Ibero American Network - Rodrigo Pardo / Colombia
Different needs for guidelines: diseases, medicines & economics - Albertino Damasceno / Mozambique
10:30 – 11:15 Coffee break and poster presentation
11:15 – 13:00 Parallel sessions / Workshops
PARALLEL SESSIONS
Room Expanção Messionária
Guideline Implementation I
O1 Establishing an evidence dissemination and implementation unit to support new, multi-disciplinary mental health services in using evidence and guidelines in practice
Michaela Willet1,3, Sarah Hetrick1,3, Alexandra Parker1,3, Patrick McGorry1,2, Rosemary Purcell1,3
1Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 2Orygen Youth Health, Melbourne, Australia, 3Headspace Australia's Youth Mental Health Foundation, Melbourne, Australia
O2 Using Action-Types to Design Guideline Implementation Systems
Richard Shiffman, Edwin Lomotan, George Michel
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
O3 Implementation of a Clinical Guideline based on a Physician Outreach Visit in Obstetrics
Jussara Munareto1,2, Airton Stein1,3, Ronaldo Bordin1, Fernando Bernd2, Genes Bersch2
1Ufrgs, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2Unimed, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 3GHC,UFCSPA,Ulbra, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
O4 Possible barriers to implementing clinical practice guidelines in Brazilian private health system
Jorge Carvalho1, Rochele Santos1, Martha Oliveira1, Karla Coelho1, Alfredo Scaff1, Fausto dos Santos1, Wanderley Bernardo2, Luciana Fonseca1
1Agência Nacional de Saúde Suplementar, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Associação Médica Brasileira, São Paulo, Brazil
O5 Barriers to adhere to the preoperative fasting guideline and how to overcome them
Dirk Ubbink, Hester Vermeulen
Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
O6 Building bridges between guidelines and clinical practice in the allied health professions
Pierre Trudelle, Christian Boissier, Marielle Lafont
French National Authority for Health, Saint-Denis, France
O7 Identification of barriers and implementation of strategies to improve timing and creation of appropriate access for new haemodialysis patients
Pamela Lopez-Vargas1, Martin Gallagher2, Jonathan Craig1,3, Rowan Walker4, Paul Snelling5, Eugenia Pedagogos4, Nicholas Gray6, Murthy Divi7, Alastair Gillies8, Michael Suranyi9, Hla Thein10, Kevan Polkinghorne11
1Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2Concord Repatriation and General Hospital, New South Wales, Australia, 3School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 4North West Dialysis Services, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia, 5Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia, 6Nambour General Hospital, Queensland, Australia, 7Gold Coast Hospital, Queensland, Australia, 8John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, Australia, 9Liverpool Hospital, New South Wales, Australia, 10Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, 11Monash Medical Centre, Victoria, Australia
Room Descobrimentos Portugueses
Guidelines crossing borders I
O8 Transnational collaboration in developing and updating guidelines for primary care: experiences from Belgium (Domus
Paul Van Royen1, Anne Vanwelde2, Lex Goudswaard3
1Domus Medica, Antwerp, Belgium, 2Societé Scientifique de Médecine Générale, Brussels, Belgium, 3Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap, Utrecht, Netherlands
O9 The Launch of NHS Evidence
Gillian Leng, Mark Salmon, Paul Chrisp
NICE, Manchester, United Kingdom
O10 Comparison of recommendations from Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for stroke management
Javier Gracia, Beatriz Nieto, Raquel Luengo, Petra Diaz del Campo, Juan Antonio Blasco
Agencia Lain Entralgo, Madrid, Spain
O11 Comparing the methods used by HAS and NICE to develop clinical practice guidelines
Michel Laurence, Gersende Georg, Christine Revel-Delhom, Sandrine Buscail
Haute Autorité de Santé, Saint-Denis La Plaine, France
O12 Healthcare professionals' experiences of the automatic decision support- A study method for developing the EBMeDS forward
Tiina Kortteisto1, Minna Kaila1,2, Jorma Komulainen2,3, Pekka Rissanen1
1University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland, 2National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland, 3The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim, Helsinki, Finland
L 1 Transnational collaboration on guideline development: the way forward!
Sonja Kersten1, Daphne Stemkens2, Joan Vlayen1
1ACCC, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2KCE, Brussels, Belgium
Main Auditorium
Use of guidelines
O13 Getting a Grip on Arthritis©: A National Community-Based Educational Intervention to Improve Primary Health Care (PHC) Management of Arthritis
Mary Bell1,2, Jennifer Boyle1,2, Sydney Lineker1,2, Elizabeth Badley1,2
1Arthritis Community Research Evaluation Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
O14 Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: Partnering Health Services Research with Guidelines to Impact Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes
Diane Sawchuck, Peter von Dadelszen
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
O15 The effect of guidelines on clinical decision making in Nephrology practice: a qualitative study
Michelle J Irving1,2, Allison Tong1,2, Lucie Rychetinik2, Rowan G Wlaker3, Michael S Frommer2, Jonathan C Craig1,2
1Centre for Kidney Research- Children's Hospital Westmead, Westmead NSW, Australia, 2School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW, Australia, 3Department of Nephrology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
O16 Infant bronchiolitis follow-up: common multidisciplinary protocol and toolkit for Health Professionals and Patients: acceptability and feasability in French Primary Care Trusts (PCT).
Claudie Locquet, Gersende Georg
French National Authority for Health, Saint Denis La Plaine, France
O17 Utilization of SAGES guidelines by its membership: Initial analysis.
Dimitrios Stefanidis1,2, William Richardson1,3, Robert Fanelli1,4
1Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, United States, 3Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, LA, United States, 4Berkshire Medical Center, Pittsfield, MA, United States
Room Exposições
Quality and updating of guidelines
O18 How valid are evidence-based guidelines? - Comparative analysis of guideline recommendations with current systematic reviews using the example of diabetes mellitus type2
Michaela Eikermann, Nicole Holzmann, Wiebke Hoffmann, Regine
Potthast, Volker Vervölgyi, Thomas Kaiser, Marion Danner, Uwe
Hasenbein, Alric Rüther
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
O19 The quality of CPGs in the last two decades: An overview of reviews
Pablo Alonso-Coello1,2, Affan Ifran3, Ivan Sola1, Jako Burgers4,5, Mario Delgado-Noguera6,7, David Rigau1, Montserrat Tort1, Xavier Bonfill1, Holger Schunemann8
1Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Barcelona, Cataluna, Spain, 2Ciber de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica
(CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain, 3Interactive Research and Development, The Indus Hospital., Karachi, Pakistan, 4Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement
CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 5Scientic Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud University Medical
Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6of Pediatrics, University of
Cauca, Cauca, Colombia, 7Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Preventive Medicine Departments, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona,
Cataluna, Spain, 8Department of Clinical Epidemiology &
Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
O20 Updating Clinical Practice Guideline. Methodological Handbook
José Miguel Carrasco1, Flavia Salcedo1, Pablo Alonso-Coello2,8, Javier Gracia3, Ivan Solà2, Rafael Rotaeche4, Arritxu Etxeberría4, Petra
Díaz-Del Campo3, Carlos González5, Antoni Parada6, Maria-Dolors Estrada6, Rosa Rico7, José María Mengual1
1Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud, Aragón, Spain, 2Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano (Hospital Sant
Pau), Cataluña, Spain, 3Agencia Laín Entralgo, Madrid, Spain, 4Servicio Vasco de
Salud, País Vasco, Spain, 5Servicio Gallego de Salud, Galicia, Spain, 6Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnología e Investigación
Médica, Cataluña, Spain, 7Departamento de Sanidad del País Vasco, País Vasco, Spain, 8CIBER de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica
(CIBERESP), Spain, Spain
O21 When to Update Guidelines: A pragmatic approach
Vanessa Nunes1, Elizabeth Shaw2
1Royal College of Physicians, National Clinical Guidelines Centre for Acute and Chronic Conditions, London, United Kingdom, 2National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom
O22 An international survey about the updating process of Clinical Practice Guidelines
Pablo Alonso-Coello1,9, José Miguel Carrasco2, Flavia Salcedo2, Ivan Solà1, Rosa Rico3,
Maria-Dolors Estrada4, Javier Gracia5, Petra Díaz-Del Campo5, Rafael Rotaeche6, Jako Burgers7, Safia Qureshi8, José María Mengual2
1Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano (Hospital Sant Pau), Cataluña, Spain, 2Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la
Salud, Aragón, Spain, 3Departamento de Sanidad del País Vasco, País Vasco, Spain, 4Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnología e Investigación
Médica, Cataluña, Spain, 5Agencia Laín Entralgo, Madrid, Spain, 6Servicio Vasco de
Salud, País Vasco, Spain, 7Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Utrecht, Netherlands, 8Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 9CIBER de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica
(CIBERESP), Spain
L2 AGREE II: Advancing development, reporting and evaluation of practice guidelines
Melissa Brouwers1, Julie Makarski1, Michelle E. Kho1, George P. Browman2, Jako S. Burgers3, Francoise Cluzeau4, Dave Davis5, Gene Feder6, Beatrice Fervers7, Ian D. Graham8, Jeremy Grimshaw9, Steven E. Hanna1, Peter Littlejohns10, Louise Zitzelsberger11
1McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada, 3Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement
CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 4St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom, 5Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, United States, 6University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 7Centre Leon
Berard, Lyon, France, 8University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 9Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 10National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London, United Kingdom, 11Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Room Brasil
Guidelines and patient involvement
O23 A comparative study of patient involvement in cancer Guideline Development Groups:
Project De-Colle
Beatrice Fervers1, Herve Cazeneuve1, Julien Carretier2
1Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, Rhône, France, 2Institut National du Cancer, Paris, Île de France, France
O24 A new method for patient participation in the Netherlands; a
WIKI-based pilot study
Elvira den Breejen1, Willianne Nelen1, Rosella Hermens2, Jan Kremer1
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center,
Nijmegen, Netherlands, 2IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherland
O25 Consumer engagement for a public health guideline - benefits of early consultation
Marisa Bialowas, Vesna Cvjeticanin
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Canberra, ACT, Australia
O26 Australia's approach to consumer involvement in the development of breast and ovarian
cancer guidelines
Helen Zorbas, Ornella Care, Alison Pearce, Rosemary Wade, Katrina Anderson, Vivienne
Milch, Anne Nelson,
National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre, Surry Hills, NSW, Australia
O27 Public involvement in the development of leaflet for colorectal cancer screening
Chisato Hamashima1, Chiaki Ishigaki2
1National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan, 2Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan
O28 Lessons for optimalization of patient participation in guideline development
Lia van der Ham, Jacqueline Broerse, Saskia van Veen
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
029 "We were the group's conscience" - an evaluation of patient and carer impact on NICE's clinical guideline development
Victoria Thomas
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), London, United Kingdom
WORKSHOPS
Room Timor
W1 Evidence tables: How to make the data shareable?
Mlika-cabanne Najoua1, Twaddle Sara2, Hill Kelvin3, De Beer Hans4
1Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Saint Denis, France, 2Scotland Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 3Stroke Foundation, Melbourne, Australia, 4Dutch Association of Nursing-home Specialists, Utrecht, Netherlands
Room Sociedade Ciêntifica
W2 Improving participation of health allied professionals and nurses in guideline development
Philip Van der Wees1,2, Antonio Lopes1,3, Sarah Bazin1,4, Maria Augusta de Sousa5, Jan Custers2, Else Poot6, Dunja Dreesens7, Jenny Gordon10
1European Region of the World Confederation for Physical Therapy (ER-WCPT), Brussels, Belgium, 2Koninklijk Nederlands Genootschap voor Fysiotherapie (KNGF; Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy), Amersfoort, Netherlands, 3Associacao Portuguesa de Fisiotherapistas (APF ; Association of Portuguese Physiotherapists), S. Domingo de Rana, Portugal, 4Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP), London, United Kingdom, 5Bastonária da Ordem dos Enfermeiros (Portuguese Order of Nursing), Lisboa, Portugal, 6Landelijk Expertisecentrum Verpleging & Verzorging (Netherlands Centre of Excellence in Nursing), Utrecht, Netherlands, 7ZonMw, Nederlandse organisatie voor gezondheidsonderzoek en zorginnovatie (Netherlands organisation for health research and develoment), Den Haag, Netherlands, 8Maastricht University, Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht, Netherlands, 9UMC St Radboud, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 10Royal College of Nursing (RCN), Oxford, United Kingdom
13:00 – 13:45 Lunch
13:45 – 14:15 Poster competition I
14:15 – 15:45 Parallel sessions / Workshops
PARALLEL SESSIONS
Room Expanção Messionária
Guideline Implementation II
O30 Implementing evidence-based guidelines to reduce inappropriate diagnostic practice
Phillip Bairstow, Jennifer Persaud, Richard Mendelson, Long Nguyen
Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
O31 Fostering the implementation of clinical practice guidelines by training facilitators
Rose Derenne, Christian Boissier
HAS, St Denis, France
O32 Implementing preventive care guidelines in general practice: lessons learnt from preconception care
Danielle Mazza, Anna Chapman
Monash University, Mellbourne, Victoria, Australia
O33 Perceived barriers to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines:
why don't general practitioners adhere to guideline recommendations in practice?
Marjolein Lugtenberg1, Judith Zegers1,2, Gert Westert1,3, Jako Burgers4,5
1Tilburg University (Tranzo), Tilburg, Netherlands, 2Amphia hospital, Breda, Netherlands, 3National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, Netherlands, 4Radboud University Medical Centre (IQ healthcare), Nijmegen, Netherlands, 5Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands
O34 Systems Impact of Implementing and Using Nursing Best Practice Guidelines (BPGs) in 3
Canadian Hospitals
Nancy Matthew-Maich1,2, Jenny Ploeg1, Susan Jack1, Maureen Dobbins1
1McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2Mohawk College, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
O35 Prioritising Implementation Support for SIGN Guidelines in Scotland
Ali El-Ghorr, Mary Deas, Nicola Aitken, Safia Qureshi
SIGN, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
Room
Descobrimentos portugueses
Guidelines and decision makers
L3 The NHS Evidence Accreditation Scheme
Gillian Leng, Mark Salmon, Paul Chrisp
NICE, Manchester, United Kingdom
O36 Estimating time and costs for Guidelines' Development
Alexander Nast, Lukas Graf, Ricardo Erdmann, Delano Pathirana, Berthold Rzany
Division of Evidence based Medicin in Dermatology (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
O37 Use of Language to Convey Obligation in Practice Guidelines: Suggestions for a
Standardised Approach
Richard Shiffman1, Edwin Lomotan1, George Michel1, Zhenqiu Lin2
1Yale Center for Medical Informatics, New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 2Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
O38 Improving decision-makers response to guidance that a new interventional procedure is
‘safe and efficacious´
Tania Lourenco1, Adrian Grant1, Luke Vale1,2, Jennifer Burr1
1Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 2Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdee, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
O39 A national patient safety programme: Towards the drafting of new guidelines
Pierre TRUDELLE
Guidelines and quality indicators I
Auditorium
O40 Synergies through Integrating Guideline and Quality Indicator Development – Experiences from a National Programme
Klaus Döbler
National Institue for Quality in Health Care (BQS), Düsseldorf, Germany
O41 Development of a Starter Set of Ambulatory Quality Indicators
Friederike Burgdorf
National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV), Berlin, Germany
O42 Simultaneous Development of Guidelines and Quality Indicators – Results of an International Survey
Martin Scherer
University Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
O43 Development of Quality Indicators as an Integral Part of Guideline Production – Methodology and Results from the German National Disease Management Guidelines Programme
Monika Nothacker
ÄZQ
O44 Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Identify Subject Areas for Quality Assurance Measures
Michaela Eikermann
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany: Using Clinical Practice Guidelines to Identify Subject Areas for Quality Assurance Measures
WORKSHOPS
Room Exposições
W3 SEARCH filter testing: achievements thus far and next steps for the future
Rikie Deurenberg1,2, Kitty Rosenbrand1,2, Michele Hilton-Boon1,3
1The SEARCH Working Group, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Glasgow, United Kingdom
Room Brasil
W4 Evidence across borders – can guidelines do the same?
Susanne Rabady1, Ilkka Kunnamo2,3
1Medical University, Salzburg, Austria, 2;edical University, Helsinki, Finland, 3Duodecim Medical Publications LTD, Helsinki, Finland
Room Timor
W5 Engaging with consumers around the world - learning from the challenges and achievements of the Cochrane Collaboration Consumer Network
Janet Wale1, Amanda Burls2
1Cochrane Consumer Network, Melbourne, Australia, 2Postgraduate Programmes in Evidence-Based Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Room Sociedade Ciêntifica
W6 AGREE II: Workshop A – A training introduction to AGREE II
Melissa Brouwers1, Julie Makarski1, George P. Browman2, Jako S. Burgers3, Francoise Cluzeau4, Dave Davis5, Gene Feder6, Beatrice Fervers7, Ian D. Graham8, Jeremy Grimshaw9, Steven E. Hanna1, Michelle E. Kho1, Peter Littlejohns10, Louise Zitzelsberger11
1McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 2British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island, BC, Canada, 3Dutch Institute for Health Care Improvement CBO, Utrecht, Netherlands, 4St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom, 5Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC, United States, 6University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 7Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France, 8University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 9Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 10National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London, United Kingdom, 11Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
15:45 – 16:30 Coffee break and poster presentation
Main Auditorium
16:30 – 18:00 PLENARY II /Developments in guideline development
A short history of guideline methodology - Francoise Cluzeau / UK
Critical discussion: Theory and practice of using GRADE - Holger Schunemann / Canada and Robin Harbour / Scotland
Room Expanção Messionária
18:00 – 19:00 Informal meeting on implementation
|
